CO129-381 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1911 [11-12] — Page 516

503

-nave IIs 13tw Izeb od dnejeymoo só teum Jl bedøstɔ sɗ OF

sd solvbe a'Istoren yemnosti odt ti neve bas‚æetėliaut

bollsup at motmigo Bid dart tost odd em of ber197814

ed Jon IIIW ROD and Jant ewode BO880 9пOl od bran07 mi

.1 of beijolle anoijonut eN# IITIUt od dnsdB QMO D

dolfa talv sdd to ritansl add delw notzennoo al .0

erom nevs ns ymofon end of ysq fil, exbut isdansde ent

Młynow Bi evan ot era ew antæreal aesits moldeoup evctres

-Tobianos gɗd not bowo! Is need arii emið Jnsioittus or aysb

Jaomie jaloq s st atrit edasmbut to noiteraqerq hrs noits

tedi entasmi od mesa oriw nemmel ( bexooltevo vldsinsvaİ

to vodja ♬ al .efnemon bho de nettinw ed ano atnembut

eric sidiaɛoq deejaør sit ejovab of motɛua Tuo at 31 dost

Le SVAB of eldteɛog ti rebro at etnambul wod Ive os

aevlovni zej-to samo troda A .IlomuoD wi¦ edo ot Iseqqa

ti Jum .tidsinaval sego prol s ¡noltarebienos benaofonq

[Ilw enero droo won edd ni sissqqs to tail fut a al eredt

xin tert Hats I .moidet fn009 101 stel avab sent on ed

ni gwort Jog er bluɔo dołów redmua mumixen srit el eiroqqe

Nov* .danusi ouiben to eď od IIa nosit qotmaas noiɛɛee sno

Jilw stedt jell ed♪ mi eɛso yvasɗ ano vino at erent ti

hellogmoo od Illw enbut tariened? erið tædd oɛ ,emit ed even

noizstivenOO VISEBBOen ent tuontiw einamąbut, als stiTMw of

I.issnade od muster at rette,asmbul. reddo and 13tw

at

to egate and de talt medoswið noqu told avoirse from oft

Jadd sons.ioqul Jɛonu arff to at 11 meriw egalbosoung erit

odd evsť of al orfw eqbul erit, mir od blvoda tasugbut aft

anbul tento edt roswded sometettib to seas at stov malteso

bonebizzoo zllut s painsjeng tu všimtroggo og evad neg

ji ti bezoblanos vllut at theebut Iseqqs on bus ;fromabut

.Raqbul redto sit dit moltstimenoo retta nettiw dor al

of Jadi dost suit noimiyo to sonorettib on at overt tl devī

mid Jnsvenq [Ilw remsede elf dotso of yaws vinud javm

edt at golvbs aid to fitored and aombut telt» ont quivłą

preparation of the judgment. Correspondence cannot replace consultation.

D. Another serious objection to the scheme is that it must inevitably delay the hearing of urgent appeals. It often happens that it is of the utmost importance to the parties that an appeal should come on within the prescribed delays. The hearing of such appeals in the new Court would

be delayed often three or four or even five months. I take

one instance as an example There was an important banish-

ment case,

which in order to save a possible appeal to the Privy Council was heard by the Full Court in its Original Jurisdiction. As to this two questions arise: first, if the case had been heard in Original Jurisdiction no appeal

could have been heard until the next sitting of the new

Appeal Court which might be 5 months off. Secondly, the

existence of the Appeal Court will deprive litigants of the

benefit of the Original Jurisdiction of the Full Court, for

even if hearings before the existing Judges in Original

Jurisdiction are continued there will always be the appeal

to the new Appeal Court. Whichever way the question is

looked at in this case there would have been unavoidable

delays, and a question which it was of great importance to

the Government to have settled would have been left in

abeyance pending the hearing of the appeal. The recent case

under the Customs Ordinance is another instance in point.

E. Yet another objection to the scheme is the con-

gestion which will be caused in the other work of the

Court, with its consequent delays. During the two months

devoted to the sitting of the Appeal Court there will only

be one week in each month left free, which must be devoted

by the Chief Justice to clearing off arrears in Chambers

and bankruptcy, and by the Puiane Judge to working off the

arrears of summary cases. The assizes for these two months

must be postponed to the following months, and during these